JMS News

——————————————————————————————

School Sexism

——————————————————————————————

By: Lillie E.

The following content does not necessarily reflect the views of the Jeffersonian, Jefferson Middle School, its teachers, administration or staff, but is a great opinion piece written by a student of JMS. It is a mere effort to promote thinking, the ability to express views, and to encourage students to speak up with their opinions of controversial world topics. The Jeffersonian is fully committed to a respectful exchange of views.  Those commenting on this and any other piece are asked to keep the need for respect of opposing views in mind.

Jefferson’s school dress code is plainly unfair to female students. Not only the rules, but the way they are handled is completely inappropriate. The actual rules are poorly written and subjective.
The foundation of the issue is that, plainly, there is an idealism that girls should cover up in order to remain “class appropriate.”   “Not appropriate” in this situation basically means:  if is it tight, short or what teachers label sexual, it’s not appropriate. This concept of making young girls hide themselves supports the idea that it is ok for girls who are barely even teenagers to be sexualized, which is completely disgusting on the part of administration.

The part where the sexism really comes into play is when we look at the actual dress code. The rules are obviously oriented towards girls, and  one of the few rules that actually impacts boys at the school is ignored almost fully. The offensive t-shirt rule is what really brings about the injustice. In the last year, while attending Jefferson, boys at school have been wearing t-shirts that are offensive. For example, T-shirts displaying ads for Hooters™, one saying “24 hour bikini contest” and having an outline of a girl in a bikini, and one of a underwear clad model on a car have been worn to school on multiple days and have not been judged inappropriate, based on the fact that the male students “successfully” wore them repeatedly. This means that teachers find it fine for boys to promote the sexualizing of women, but girls who are still practically children are to be punished for dressing how they please.

2 thoughts on “JMS News

  1. There are many parts of the dress code that are left for the teachers to define, and since most people have a strong automatic bias against females, then the teachers probably overlook boys that are out of dress code while their automatic bias has them notice strongly and negatively any girls that are out of dress code. The dress code could also become more specific to prevent that effect. The dress code rules should also effect evenly boys and girls, making special effort to assure that there is an equally strict dress code applying to boys.

    Maybe you could write about the new electronics policy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s